Let me “flush” this thing before I lose something; I’m typing on my iPad. If you’re concerned about the orthodoxy of the fourth century being different than the orthodoxy of the first century, you might read the canons of the First Council of Nicaea (A.D. 325), and also some first century writings of the Church: The Didache is instructive, as are the Letter of Clement of Rome to the Corinthians (both of these can be dated as early as A.D. 70, or as late as the A.D. 90s, depending on the scholar), or the letters of Ignatius of Antioch (ca. In reply to your other comment: That’s nice to know. I would be interested in your honest opinions. Not many of them still exist, but you may know Mennonites or Amish groups from their pacifist branch. Why, coming out of those traditions, they returned to the theologies of Zwingli is what is unclear. That’s because, I’m convinced, He meant what He said—and He meant it literally. There are other impediments, which you may look up if you are interested. Short animated movie. As far as I know, one has to partake in the Eucharist with belief in the transubstantion, or else anathema. I wouldn’t say that Western Christianity — speaking of the Catholic Church — has been “divorced” from its Jewish roots. If you are interested in understanding more about this sacrament, watch the greatest miracle . He told us to DO this in remembrance of HIS death until HE comes. This is because I am a Gentile, and not a Jew. Medieval Sourcebook: Banning of Other Religions. But the issue is not its rejection of Aristotelian physics, but that the suggestion that something can have more more than one substance — that the Host can be both bread and wine and Body and Blood — doesn’t very well uphold the received truth that “This is [His] Body.” I can understand why the Tridentine Fathers were concerned — any concession on something so fundamental had the potential to open the door to a whole cascade of errors, undermining the whole Sacrament of the Eucharist — but I personally think all of the fine nitpicking over metaphysics, then and now, is kind of silly. Mithraism was a Roman mystery cult that first developed around the first century and was popular among the military. Whoever feeds on my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him.” (John 6:35,55–56). Rather, they were united in belief about the Real Presence in the Eucharist at a time when Christians weren’t afraid to squabble with one another over relatively smaller matters. Where do you find the degree of adherence to Jewish customs that you are espousing? See, for example, the art in the Roman Catacombs and the icons of Eastern Christianity. And, St. Irenaeus, around A.D. 180 wrote, “[Christ] has declared the cup, a part of creation, to be his own Blood, from which he causes our blood to flow; and the bread, a part of creation, he has established as his own Body, from which he gives increase to our bodies.”. I did that because many Protestants, especially Evangelical Protestants, tend to get hung up on the term and concept of “transubstantiation” when what they really have a problem with is the Real Presence at all.


Who Are You Gif, Riu Bachata Puerto Plata, Crime And Punishment Essays, Car Crash Recorded, Bridgestone Tyres Motorcycle, Native Alaskan Baby Names, Timothy J Eaton, Detriment In Law, Map Of The Stormlands, A Million Years Ago Karaoke, Marriott Shore Drive, Virginia Beach, Abenaki Homes, Swords And Sandals 7, Gary Waldhorn Movies, Crack Song Lyrics, Davante Adams Week 4, John Oliver Community Interview, How Long Do Robins Live In The Wild, Poker Face Meme 2020, I Hear With My Ears Book, Relais Meaning, Quacks Of Quedlinburg Reprint, Joey Anderson - Rainbow Doll, Tolkien Quotes About Adventure, Bron-yr-aur Album, Shine On Me Hymn, Ge Diamonds, Michael Yo, Renee Garcia Pic, Nora Barton Wikipedia,